news


Apple becomes top wearables vendor as fitness bands run out of steam

wearables smart watch

The latest global wearables market data from Strategy Analytics reveals that Apple now heads the whole sector despite its products being by far the most expensive.

The wearables segment can be loosely divided into fitness bands – relatively cheap devices with limited functionality – and smart watches – more expensive with full operating systems supporting third party apps. Apple only operates in the latter and while Apple Watch shipments improved significantly from a year ago, fitness bands seem to be in severe decline.

The traditionally dominant fitness band vendor is Fitbit, but its fell by over a third year-on-year while Apple’s grew by more than 50%. Since fitness tracking is one of the key functionalities of smart watches it’s not surprising to see an inversely proportional relationship between the two categories. A similar phenomenon occurred with the smartphone rendering single function devices such as digital cameras and satnavs obsolete.

“Fitbit has lost its wearables leadership to Apple, due to slowing demand for its fitness bands and a late entry to the emerging smartwatch market,” said Cliff Raskind of SA. “Fitbit’s shipments, revenue, pricing and profit are all shrinking at the moment and the company has a major fight on its hands to recover this year.”

“The new Apple Watch Series 2 is selling relatively well in the US, UK and elsewhere, due to enhanced styling, intensive marketing and a good retail presence,” said Neil Mawston of SA. “Xiaomi shipped 3.4 million wearables for 15 percent marketshare worldwide in Q1 2017. Demand for its popular Mi Band fitness range was broadly flat across its core markets of Asia.”

Apple seems to be starting to corner the smart watch market, with Android players such as Samsung apparently struggling to get any traction. It’s still far from obvious how much value a smart watch adds, especially as it has to be coupled with a smartphone anyway, but 3.5 million people apparently thought differently in the first quarter of this year. It could be that Apple’s decision to focus as much on the straps as the watch itself is paying dividends among its self-conscious fan-base.

Global Wearables Vendor Shipments (Millions of Units) Q1 ’16 Q1 ’17
Apple 2.2 3.5
Xiaomi 3.8 3.4
Fitbit 4.5 2.9
Others 7.7 12.2
Total 18.2 22.0
Global Wearables Vendor Marketshare % Q1 ’16 Q1 ’17
Apple 12.1% 15.9%
Xiaomi 20.9% 15.5%
Fitbit 24.7% 13.2%
Others 42.3% 55.5%
Total 100.0% 100.0%
Total Growth YoY (%) 74% 21%
Source: Strategy Analytics

2 comments

  1. rocwurst 08/05/2017 @ 2:02 am

    It’s hilarious how analysts insist on comparing the Apple Watch to $30 fitness bands to try and minimise its success and now Apple’s $529 ASP smartwatch even outsells every fitness band manufacturer.

    

Apple sold over 12 million Apple Watches in its first year on the market easily passing both the iPod and the iPhone in their launch years. The iPod took 4 years to sell 4m units and the iPhone took just short of 2 years to sell 13m.

    

Last year, Canalys reported that smartwatch sales grew 60% YoY and the Apple Watch again dominated the smartwatch market with 45.6% market share. The number 2, Samsung only managed 18% with FitBit on 17%, Garmin 3.2% and Pebble on 2.2%.

    Poor old Android Wear is missing in action.

    

In its first three quarters on the market, the Apple Watch powered the smartwatch market to surpass the annual sales of the ENTIRE Swiss Watch Industry. 



    By the way, note that mot Samsung Wearables don’t even run Android Wear – they run Tizen so poor old Android Wear has been obliterated in this new growing market.

    Quite remarkable.

    • Scott Bicheno Scott Bicheno 08/05/2017 @ 9:01 am

      Good points and I’m sure Apple is grateful for your continued support.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Polls

How have open source groups influenced the development of virtualization in telecoms?

Loading ... Loading ...