LTE and the backhaul challenge

LTE networks need big pipes for backhaul as well

LTE mobile broadband has already been rolled out in some markets and is on the verge of deployment in many more, but as data consumption grows, a challenge that will face operators is how to backhaul their LTE networks. Without enough backhaul capacity for their networks, network customers will not feel they are getting the level of service they have paid for, which is one of the prime causes for customer churn.

Today, 3G mobile broadband is commonly deployed in developed markets and provides sufficient bandwidth for basic browsing and small downloads. However, consumers often complain that more data intensive tasks, such as video streaming, are often erratic and inconsistent using 3G. LTE is being pitched as a solution to this problem but without the necessary infrastructure in place to provide sufficient backhaul capacity, operators will continue to leave customers underwhelmed.

“If operators are planning to offer 100Mbps to customers by LTE, the backhaul required would be 150Mbps or even more – and it would be over-provisioned,” said Dimitris Mavrakis, principal analyst at Informa Telecoms and Media. “Most of the deployments so far have been fibre-based, for example, Verizon’s LTE is capitalising on its fibre network, and that’s the reason why it’s so aggressive and are able to roll out LTE so quickly and in so many markets.”

But in order to provide the necessary coverage as data usage grows, operators have increasingly begun to rely on the use of small cells for their 3G networks. With small cells, operators can use many cells distributed across a geographical area to provide better coverage and satisfy customer demands.

LTE networks will need to provide speeds of up to 144Mbps to each cell. However, to deliver fibre to each small cell is not an practical option, due to the cost of leasing fibre, coupled with the work required to dig trenches to each individual small cell.

Therefore, vendors are providing fibre up to basestation towers, and then the rest of the signal is distributed by radiowave technology to the small cells. Operators can plan the contention ratio required and provide a reasonable amount of bandwidth into those radiowaves. There are various technologies on the market that aim to address this issue, and Mavrakis believes point-to-multipoint millimetre wave technology offers a compelling solution.

“Millimetre wave technology is very interesting simply because there’s so much bandwidth available so these backhaul solutions are capable of providing multi-gigabit capacity,” he said.

Bluwan is one vendor providing point to multipoint technology, and Shayan Sanyal, the firm’s CMO, believes that operators need to begin thinking about LTE small cell backhaul, as if they do not take necessary steps, their 4G networks will not deliver on the capabilities that LTE can provide.

“The reason the small cell approach is popular is because you can provide more bandwidth to fewer people,” he said. “But not a lot of thought has been given by the industry on how to backhaul small cell for LTE, so manufacturers of small cells are scrambling to figure out how to provide capacity – because the customers are saying, great technology, but how can you make it work?”

He argued that other technologies do have their use cases, but are not suitable for providing bandwidth to small cells on LTE networks. For example, point-to-point microwave requires each macro cell to have a large number of dishes installed across an area, however the installation and rental costs needed to for those dishes are very high.

“Then you have point-to-multi-point microwave, which requires almost half as many dishes, but do not provide enough capacity. Using that technology, operators can provide capacity of up to 100Mbps in total, but LTE small cells need 144Mbps delivered to each cell.”

Point to multi-point millimetre wave provides capacity of 2Gbps and can deliver 150Mbps-200Mbps to 10 sites and, according to Mavrakis, is a cheaper option too.

“It is cheaper not because of the technology itself, but because of the topology. You can put sector antennae at the distribution point, then you can connect several cells instead of having two antennae for each link,” he said.

However, he added that operators are not yet using small cells for their LTE networks, but that will be the next step of deployment and operators are likely to begin using them in one or two years.

“There’s a lot of activity from vendors on this, meaning that there’s a lot of demand from operators. Point to multipoint millimetre wave will be something to look out for,” he said.

One comment

  1. Avatar Marc Lippe 25/01/2012 @ 3:00 pm

    Dawinderpal, you are right that mobile operators are facing many challenges while transitioning to the next generation of backhaul on their LTE networks. While mobile data traffic volumes will continue to grow exponentially, revenue will not. This is leading led mobile operators to embrace Ethernet technology to future-proof their backhaul environments for explosive data growth and 4G mobile networks, while driving down “per-bit” costs. Nearly every operator aspiring to launch long term evolution (LTE) services is “preparing the ground” by deploying an Ethernet-based backhaul network.

    However, leaving customers satisfied requires more than simply increasing bandwidth. The traditional approach of oversizing the network infrastructure is counter-productive, as it will defeat the purpose of Ethernet as a cost-effective technology. Nevertheless, while right-sizing is critical to staying aligned with the objective of cost containment, quality of experience (QoE) requires also must be balanced in parallel. Customers who signed up for expensive data service packages, especially those with international usage, expect high QoE. When they don’t get it, they are much more likely to churn.

    Thus, to keep customers happy, mobile operators must be able to successfully monitor the mobile service quality performance over the all-IP mobile infrastructure. They need a carrier-grade service performance assurance platform that will provide them with the actionable service quality visualization they need, end-to-end, to proactively manage capacity planning and improve operational efficiency, while fostering QoE across the mobile network (mobile packet core, legacy voice core and mixed-generation RAN) and into the underlying IP-transport entities along the service delivery path.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


There are no upcoming events.


Do you agree public funding should be used to support mobile operators to more broadly deploy Open RAN?

Loading ... Loading ...