Parallel Wireless attacks Huawei amid geo-political tensions
The majority of the telecoms industry is attempting to avoid the mudslinging between the US and China, but OpenRAN firm Parallel Wireless has charged in headfirst.
Presumably the business has no intention in trying to crack the Chinese market, as it has seemingly closed that door firmly with its latest media statement.
“Huawei indeed has ‘the best equipment’ in telecom,” said Steve Papa, CEO of Parallel Wireless.
“The Communist Party of China has invested hundreds of billions in chip research, development, and production as part of the Made in China 2025 strategic plan. That is why all countries need to act in their nation’s interests to select suppliers that are secure and are not sponsored by political parties.”
Huawei has consistently denied any ties to the Chinese Government, and aside a brief stint in the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) from Huawei founder Ren Zhengfei, there has been little credible evidence. With respect to this assault, Huawei has been contacted to comment but had not responded at the time of writing.
While the telecoms space is usually well behaved and respectful, this is a different approach from Parallel Wireless. Huawei has launched a campaign in the UK press in an attempt to assure its position, but Parallel Wireless has clearly taken issue with this programme.
Few rivals of Huawei want to get involved with the political tensions the Chinese vendor is being dragged into. The likes of Ericsson and Nokia have regularly refused to comment on the situation, though the latter’s CTO got reprimanded last June after an incredibly ill-advised interview where Huawei’s security credentials were called into question.
The general approach has almost always been to rise above the rhetoric, get along with your own business, irrelevant as to whether a bit of China-bashing might offer some commercial benefits. Not here.
OpenRAN has been touted as a technology which can reduce the world’s reliance on Chinese vendors. It is an open field for the moment, though the majority of suppliers seem to be from the US. This is perhaps the reason there is so much enthusiasm from the US Government; it kills two birds with one stone:
- Additional competition is introduced to weaken the Huawei position
- The US is catapulted to relevance in the network infrastructure game, a position it has not been in for decades
This statement from Parallel Wireless is one which embraces the geopolitical tension, fuel doused onto the already flaming US-Chinese relationship. It is one of corporate opportunism, an attempt to crowbar Parallel Wireless into the conversation at the expense of Huawei.
In the statement, not only is the firm directly suggesting that Huawei is a puppet of the Chinese Government, it also believes ramping up the US semiconductor industry is one way to secure victory. This is not an incorrect statement, but the chipset segment is only one element of an increasingly complex equation.
Parallel Wireless is generally not afraid to make bold statements in the press, but it is also one of the biggest beneficiaries of the momentum gathering in the OpenRAN movement. It has numerous trials already in place with the likes of Etisalat, Vodafone and MTN, and would be one of the more recognised names in this embryonic segment.
The higher the tensions between the US and China, the more money which will be directed towards Chinese alternatives. For Parallel Wireless, conflict is good for business.
It’s just a matter of time, when likes of Parallel Wireless will steal the show and legacy telecom vendors like H/E/N… will start loosing the game
Problem for this writer is that there are very few westerners who work at a senior level within telecoms that would disagree with him. Further, it seems quite ok for the Chinese to hurl the vilest of insults, talking about bloodshed, Guo Ping’s little Prism Prism on the wall stunt at MWC – my god, if any westerner was so brazen as to do that they would be hauled off stage. Not to mention it’s premise was totally incorrect. The NSA has a direct equivalent in China of the MSS who engages in the exact same thing, only on a far larger scale, controlling around 20 or APT groups.
What Steve says represents the frustration many of us have. Ericsson’s technology is every bit the equal of Huawei, the one area where it is let down is in the financing. Ericsson doesn’t subsidise they product with an endless line of credit from the Swedish government, or the EU, no one can offer the terms of the Chinese because the Chinese are chasing a market objective of both domination and killing the competition, not commercial returns which is what drives their western counterparts. That China should be doubted in their intentions should be dispelled by reading the text of MIC2025 – domination in 11 key industries and Huawei is the keystone to the entire effort.
Western governments are very wide awake to the threat now. Open and fair competition is all that we all want, but when the playing field is so slanted in. The direction of Huawei then it should come as no surprise that over companies and governments are calling it out and taking action.
Clarification – the “him” at the end of the first sentence I was referring to Steve Papa, not the author of this piece.
The world’s most popular chip, made by America’s Intel Corporation, is produced illegally in Israel in collusion with Russian Oligarch Lev Leviev. Intel hijacked our industrial property, using it to dump their hazardous wastes in order to save on their business costs at our expense, and expense of the health and environment of Israeli and Palestinian citizens (living in region). Criminal Intel is a con fraudulent bribing corporation, it is certain that their failure to China is only a question of time.
Bye bye Intel, burn hard, take your bribed politicians with you.