news


FCC boosts OpenRAN legitimacy with high profile forum

Ajit Pai and his commissioners hosted an online forum on 5G Open Radio Access Network to promote the technology as an opportunity for American companies to regain leadership in the mobile market.

The forum was originally scheduled for March but was push back due to COVID-19. The high calibre participants included all five FCC commissioners under Pai, US and overseas telecom operators, vendors, think tanks, and academia. The Department of Commerce dispatched a representative, and Mike Pompeo, the US Secretary of State, also sent in a recorded video message.

Ajit Pai opened the sessions by framing OpenRAN in both a security context, which was also Pompeo’s angle, and an economics context. He highlighted the security risk of Huawei’s equipment on account of the vendor’s close relations with China’s ruling Communist party and the country’s national intelligence law. He believed “the long-term costs of using insecure equipment (from Huawei) are likely to outweigh any short-term savings.”

On the other hand, he also saw the current stronghold on 5G equipment market by a few suppliers, despite their trustworthy background, not conducive to innovation or efficiency improvement. “Vendor diversity is useful in terms of price competition, avoiding the lock-in problem, and ensuring a backup supplier, among other things,” he said.

A couple of common themes ran through the six-hour long forum (excluding a lunch break) of panel discussions and the FCC Commissioners’ keynotes. The first is the resolve to bring America back to the leadership position in the telecoms industry. There was plenty of nostalgia. Robert Blair, Director of Policy and Strategic Planning in the Department of Commerce, lamented the fall from grace of yesterday’s giants Lucent and Motorola, while Jane Harman, the Congresswoman turned CEO of Woodrow Wilson Center, was not impressed by the American surrender of the front seat in the standardisation bodies. “If we are not setting the standards, someone else is. … It is a big disadvantage which will only get bigger if we don’t change course,” she said.

The participants saw in OpenRAN an opportunity for American companies to regain that lost leadership. The logic goes that by adopting open standards and open interfaces and disintegrating the networks, entry barrier to the telecoms business is lowered. Networks become the platform for innovations to happen on top, in particular software innovations which American companies have been very good at.

Brandan Carr, one of the FCC Commissioners, likened disintegrating the telecoms networks to the unbundling of IBM’s vertically integrated computer business by Microsoft. Dell’s John Roese quipped that “the telecommunications wireless industry is the last one we have done it (unbundling) to. we have done this to compute, storage, networking, virtualization, software development, application delivery. The one outlier that is not in this modern format is telecom.”

The second strong theme is the belief that OpenRAN is able to deliver the results it promises. This sentiment was shared by both OpenRAN vendors and challenger operators. Jio is working on over 700 sites a day thanks to its embrace of OpenRAN, Mathew Oommen, its President claims. Rakuten, OpenRAN’s poster boy, has delivered the network faster than originally planned by using OpenRAN and is on course to cover 70% of Japan’s population by March next year.

Tareq Amin, Rakuten’s CEO, saw the most exciting part of OpenRAN as security, boosted by the end-to-end visibility, which he used to justify the decision to scrap the original plan to use Huawei to build its network. OpenRAN’s security credentials were also backed by DISH, the most active American carrier to embrace OpenRAN. Stephen Bye, DISH’s EVP and Chief Commercial Officer, said the company has adopted a “zero trust model” towards all vendors, and its staff’s expertise in IT systems has been used in assessing security of vendors for the open architecture.

There was also a note of caution. GlobalFoundries, “the only US supplier of chips. The rest of the chipmaking industry is offshore”, according to Peter L. Gammel, the company’s VP and CTO of the Mobile and Wireless Infrastructure business unit, forecasts that only 10% of mobile networks will be using OpenRAN by 2025. On the incumbent operator side, AT&T expressed concerns over OpenRAN’s capability to deliver the same experience to the operator’s existing customers. This is in contrast to the strong enthusiasm from DISH, though DISH also conceded that it has the luxury of not having any legacy networks or legacy systems like OSS and BSS.

The cautious tone was shared by Nokia. Marcus Weldon, Nokia’s CTO and the President of Bell Labs, after defending Nokia’s track record of openness, cautioned that although ORAN-based technologies can meet the base level performance requirements, more work needs to be done to extend on ORAN specs to reach higher performance. He also had a not too subtle dig at Ajit Pai by suggesting that the industry should not dive into a “start-ups good, incumbents bad” mindset. A hybrid approach is preferred.

There were also discussions on the government’s role in promoting OpenRAN. Suggestions included government, including the FCC, should fund OpenRAN compliance in network building, should help jumpstart start-ups, and should support OpenRAN R&D. Nvidia’s Soma Velayutham and CommScope’s Morgan Kurk argued that such support is justifiable on two accounts: telecoms is a strategic industry, and the government should help level the playing field as vendors in certain countries are being supported by their governments.

Meanwhile, Michael O’Rielly, one of the FCC Commissioners, believed OpenRAN could only succeed without government intervention, by which he meant no government mandates of technology choices, governments remaining vendor neutral, and process remaining voluntary.

In general, the arguments for OpenRAN, and even the reservations, did not bring many surprises. However, the high profile of the event itself, and its positioning of OpenRAN as an opportunity for US companies to climb back to the perch of the telecoms industry, should add to the technology’s impetus. This should be especially true in the US, notwithstanding the sometimes cringeworthy chest-thumping nationalism.

  • Private Networks in a 5G World

  • 5G Networking Digital Symposium

  • Telecoms.com LIVE: Getting the Best out of 5G

  • 5G Ecosystem Digital Symposium

  • 2020 Vision Executive Summit

  • TechXLR8

  • BIG 5G Event

  • 5G World

  • 5G Latin America


6 comments

  1. Avatar marie-paule odini 15/09/2020 @ 5:29 pm

    Great panel discussion indeed ! honored to be invited on behalf of HPE ! so excited to see the RAN being virtualized and becoming more open. We’ve been through this with NFV, virtualizing LTE, enterprise CPE, now it’s 5G ! 5G core and cloud native, and now ORAN for a software based RAN with open APIs. The E2E network is now pure software with open APIs ! no vendor lock in, no black box, open to multi vendor, more inclusive, more flexible, more secure. E2E management and orchestration can now optimize this environment to best serve existing and new use cases. But to see the full power of 5G, we need to deploy the 5G core ! the brain of the network ! interoperability testing is critical to have a true open robust multi vendor environment. HPE is not only offering 5G solutions, like open cloud native 5G core but we also launched a new Open 5G Lab in Fort Collins on hardened secure data center. open to vendors, operators to come and test 5G solutions. With ORAN common of the shelf server (COTS) solutions, this lab is a great opportunity to perform interface validation but also performance benchmarks.

    • Wei Shi Wei Shi 16/09/2020 @ 8:15 am

      Thank you for the comment, Marie-Paule! I enjoyed listening to your views during the Forum, especially the part on the new trends in edge computing.

  2. Avatar Sridhar Pai T 15/09/2020 @ 5:57 pm

    I love where 5G is going! For the first time MNOs are setting the agenda and more MNOs early members in industry associations than vendors. Great stuff! In complete agreement with Marie’s comment above..

  3. Avatar Jerome 16/09/2020 @ 7:10 am

    Open ran looks like a new idea, however its a gimmick. Open ran is not possible to
    function between core 5g and base station since it is not hard wired, unstable , slow. and attract hacker attacking. They will all regret this ideas to put in core to base, the open software will invite tremendous virus attack just like our pc systems.

    However open ran is a great idea to put it between base station and customer end. In this case all current telecom gaints are all free to compete for their long time developed hardware, but this is a trend that those gaints do not rule out to go with it.

    • Avatar Baron 17/09/2020 @ 10:30 am

      Hi Jerome,

      Your comment intrigues, can you expand on it please. Why do you think it’s a gimmick? Thanks

  4. Avatar Ranjan Mishra 17/09/2020 @ 2:50 am

    Really good discussion. Indeed it is good idea and if we as telecom industry able to proceed with this idea would be great. Of course we have to take care for security and performance.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Polls

What would be the future role of satellite communications?

Loading ... Loading ...