MWC 2023 recap – what’s the point of telecoms?

This year’s big telecoms get-together revealed an industry going through an identity crisis.

The headline question might seem like a strange one for a website with this URL to ask but we’re no longer sure we have a good answer. Since its invention in 1876 the point of the telephone (etymology: far away voice) was obvious – to be able to speak to someone who was too far away to hear your voice otherwise.

Over the ensuing decades the enormous commercial, political and social potential of being able to speak to anyone, anywhere (belatedly represented in the EE brand) became fully realised, to the enormous profit of the national monopolies that controlled it. Then, at around its centenary, we worked out how to send data over those same networks and the telecoms world exploded once more.

Almost half a century further on, however, much of that momentum seems to have left the industry. It could be argued that the most significant innovation since the creation of the internet is the touchscreen smartphone coupled with mobile broadband. But that was 15 years ago and has only progressed in minor increments since then.

Ahead of Mobile World Congress 2023 we asked “what’s the point of 5G?” hoping that we may have some kind of answer a week later. On the contrary we have come away with an even greater sense of existential anxiety about the state of the industry.

Of course there were infinite chats to be had about various technologies, efficiencies, initiatives, and partnerships but what the point of any of them in the great scheme of things? At the start of the week we reported on Nokia’s struggles to explain the point of its rebrand, let alone the industry. The next day we wrestled with the bewildering complexity of today’s telecoms proposition, with even Ericsson conceding the lack of obvious new sources of revenue offered by 5G.

Led by show organiser the GSMA, the operator community seems keen to jump on the ‘network exposure’ bandwagon, but it’s still not clear who we’re exposing it to and for what commercial purpose. We got the impression from all concerned in that initiative that it’s very much a ‘build it and they will come’ approach, with no guarantee of success. It’s increasingly clear that the same applies to 5G in general, certainly to a far greater extent than previous generations.

Huawei attempted to make the case for 5.5G, which served to illustrate how disappointing it has been so far, while Nokia seemed happy to be already looking towards 6G. The process of innovation is constant, of course, and the very concept of a G is increasingly unhelpful, but it does feel like a critique of 5G that so many in the industry are already looking beyond it.

Speaking to one senior figure from the operator side who preferred not to be named, we learned that they were underwhelmed by the operator offering this year, especially when it came to use-cases. While the vendors produce the tech, it’s surely the job of CSPs to bring it to market and get people to pay for it. One suggestion was to focus on collaboration; why not have use-case-focused, rather than company-focused stands at the show?

We also discussed the relative inefficiency of operators. Automation is a current buzzword but how much of that is actually going on? Instead of paying public cloud giants millions to take care of their convoluted business, operators should be making savings from automating as much as possible. Maybe that would help them to get back to their core business of helping their customers solve their communications problems.

Having moaned about a focus on arcana rather than use-cases, we were stuck by how little talk there was at MWC 2023 about Open RAN. Maybe that was an acknowledgement that, while opening up the radio to more providers is a nice idea, it doesn’t propose anything significant from a commercial point of view. Similarly cloud RAN and vRAN. We all get the potential of virtualisation and cloudification, but what communications problems do they uniquely solve?

A further illustration of the commercial bind operators find themselves in is their insistence, in Europe at least, that US big tech should be forced to give them money. Netflix used the show as an opportunity to flip the ‘fair contribution’ argument and, even if the EU decided to take the side of its operators, that would set a precedent that would encourage operators to rent-seek rather than innovate.

In a way previous generations never were, 5G is a massive gamble. The telecoms industry is offering up a trove of arcane but niche technological capabilities that it hopes someone else might figure out how to monetise. Maybe they will but this year’s MWC felt like everyone was in waiting mode, hoping someone else would solve the 5G use-case/monetisation problem so they could jump on their coattails.

When we asked the operator figure what the point of telecoms is they said it’s “very uncertain”. The danger of becoming a ‘dumb-pipe’ utility seems greater than ever. Nobody seems to know what communications problems need solving other than even more ubiquitous connectivity with undefined monetisation potential. If we’re no closer to answering that question by MWC 2024 then we’ve got real problems. We discuss all this and more on the MWC 2023 special podcast.


Get the latest news straight to your inbox. Register for the newsletter here.


  1. Avatar Dave 03/03/2023 @ 5:35 pm

    Does this mean that you will move on and blot out the sun for another industry? Please?

    • Scott Bicheno Scott Bicheno 06/03/2023 @ 8:59 am

      You love it.

  2. Avatar Andy Tiller 03/03/2023 @ 7:13 pm

    Ref: “Why not have use-case-focused, rather than company-focused stands at the show?” – this is very challenging commercially, but it is possible. See for example the TM Forum Catalyst projects ( showcasing at DTW Asia ( in a couple of weeks. Each project is a proof-of-concept with multiple participants creating an end-to-end use-case-focused demo. Competitor companies even participate together in the same project.

  3. Avatar Terry Edwards 03/03/2023 @ 8:01 pm

    In my opinion THE major commercial (and personal) need for increasingly high quality telecom is “hybrid working” – an optimum mixture of a distant workplace and excellent communications on the home front. Teleconferencing will continue expanding – optimally using either fiber optics or fixed wireless access (FWA) with ever-increasing software defined systems. We live in an increasingly brilliant world. Terry Edwards, Engalco-Research

  4. Avatar ANUAR M ISA 04/03/2023 @ 12:27 am

    Good mention on lack of use cases. Now that we have deployed our first private 5G industry to support our Oil n Gas business, it does seem frustrate the stakeholders for the investment they gave put on. We on our on initiative are now collaborating with various tech provider to come up with IIOT 5G enabled sensors that would greatly benefit and support our remote operation and automation program. It puzzles why chip maker like Qualcomm, Sequin and tech provider like Honeywell n Emerson are lack of appetite or shutting their eyes to see this demand or market potential.

  5. Avatar Glenn Booker 05/03/2023 @ 1:06 am

    Back when I was in grade school there was a big push on to bury phone cables under ground, giving them more protection from bombings, and listening the fear of wires breaking during thunderstorms and electrocuting people. Though it was only carried out in a small number of places before companies gave up and just kept hanging wires. The reasoning for burying phone cables still stands on both counts.

  6. Avatar adlane fellah 22/03/2023 @ 2:04 am

    telecoms are like airlines, they are essential whether they make money or not, we always criticize them but cannot leave with them

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.