Two different sets of use cases: According to the study, which surveyed 58 executives at operators worldwide, the primary drivers for 5G are better broadband performance (67%) and the Internet of Things (74%). This points to two very different use cases, one of which is focused on very high throughput mobile broadband with a particular emphasis on indoor access, and one of which is designed to deliver a variety of alternative connectivities, whether ultra-low-power and low cost (think disposable sensors) or mission-critical/low latency (think self-driving vehicles).

Two different initial research drivers: The survey correctly points to Asia as the location where much of the early work has been done, and this is true for a specific reason: South Korea will host the Winter Olympics in 2018, and Japan hosts the Summer Olympics in 2020. Both are using the events as an impetus and time target for early research, and because of the nature of the events – video-heavy, high-end terminal devices, etc. – the focus is on mobile broadband above 6 GHz. Europe and North America, on the other hand, are being driven more by societal, business, and IoT goals, resulting in research with a greater component of multi-device, IoT, and non-consumer applications. Eventually they’ll converge, but for now we have a bifurcation of focus.

Different approaches to radio access technologies (RATs): With different regions initially driven by different use cases, there’s an impact on the early definition of the required RATs. One effort is focused on eclipsing performance of 4G networks, in this case peak user throughput, reduction of latency to as low as 1 ms, and the restructuring of the network to include joint access/backhaul. The other effort will look to define a more flexible access technology that has built-in support for the broad set of requirements associated with the Internet of Things (IoT).

Correspondingly different spectrum focus: Extreme mobile broadband will require larger chunks of spectrum only available at higher frequencies (> 6 GHz), driving the design of a clean-slate air interface that is optimized for such bandwidth sizes and the propagation characteristics of higher frequencies. On the other hand, 5G for IoT, which contains multiple uses cases with diverging requirements, will be more focused on lower spectrum bands (< 6 GHz) that have more favorable propagation characteristics, with less focus on peak throughputs.

Two “new” 5Gs, and one that grows on us: According to the TIA survey, a majority of operators expect substantial overlap between 4G Advanced and 5G use-cases especially at the first introduction of 5G. 5G will surely be marked by completely new air interfaces focused around new needs and capabilities – the sort of thing that, traditionally, has heralded the deployment of a new generation of technology. In other words, for these technologies, we won’t simply be pumping LTE out in new spectrum bands. But the rollout of many other components of 5G, like LTE-LAA, Wi-Fi integration, Network Function Virtualization (NFV), Software Defined Networking (SDN), device-to-device communication, etc., will precede that “launch” moment as 4G networks continue to evolve and become yet another key component of the overall 5G network.

Traditional vs. newer licensing paradigms: In the prior “Gs” (2G, 3G, and 4G), operators have used licensed spectrum, based on a traditional approach.  Licensed spectrum will continue to be the foundation for 5G, but it won’t stand alone as it does today. As the industry starts defining initial 5G requirements, the discussion of authorized shared access spectrum has emerged and in some cases is even seen as critical to 5G. Mobile operators looking to access as much spectrum as possible have shown support for shared and unlicensed spectrum as additives to licensed spectrum. For example, many operators have shown the interest to operate LTE in the unlicensed 5GHz band with LTE-U or LTE-AA.