news


Verizon, AT&T and Comcast sued over movie piracy via their networks

Law court crime punishment

US telcos Verizon Wireless, AT&T and Comcast are being sued by media production companies over what they see as a failure to stop movie piracy, reportedly.

They have been sued by a gang of media production companies  including Voltage Pictures, After Productions and Ammo Entertainment who accuse them of ‘turning a blind eye to customers who illegally distribute and download pirated films’, according to The Hollywood Reporter.

The argument that seems to be being made is that the ISPs are ignoring the fact people are using their networks to download pirated films, and are therefore something approaching complicit in the copyright infringement/theft. It seeks to force the Verizon et al to start terminating induvial the accounts of those that do so, and block piracy websites. The media firms say over 100,000 notices were sent to Comcast about illegal downloading of ‘I Feel Pretty’ and claims ISPs have failed to investigate such complaints.

“Comcast did not take meaningful action to prevent ongoing infringements by these Comcast users,” the Hollywood Reporter quotes the complaint. “Comcast failed to terminate the accounts associated with these IP addresses or otherwise take any meaningful action in response to these Notices. Comcast often failed to even forward the Notices to its internet service customers or otherwise inform them about the Notice or its contents.”

“Verizon did not terminate customer accounts even if it received information about a high number of repeat infringements at those customer accounts. For example, Verizon Communications has allowed hundreds of infringements to occur at certain accounts, despite receiving at least as many notices of infringement regarding those accounts. And Verizon users have reported receiving multiple infringement notices from Verizon without having their accounts terminated.”

Digital piracy is obviously one of the things you have to worry about if you are in the business of producing media. It nearly destroyed the music industry before it adapted itself to the digital age, and the video games market had to go through its own growing pains with Digital Rights Management software as it sought to provide digital versions of its products in a way that might make piracy less attractive to those inclined to engage in it.

The solutions to having the fruits of your labour swiped illegally will vary depending on what is being sold – but the idea of ISPs swooping in and barring people from having an internet account en mass seems heavy handed, especially in an age in which many define access to the web as a basic human right. And whether or not failing to be cognisant of every action that occurs across its networks at any given moment equates to ‘ignoring’ copyright infringements will presumably be a point debated between the lawyers.

 

Get the latest news straight to your inbox. Register for the Telecoms.com newsletter here.


One comment

  1. Avatar Gary Weiner 16/09/2022 @ 1:22 pm

    There has to be some liability, I concur with the lawsuit action, but I think there may be indemnity somewhere in the terms we agree to, when we sign on with a carrier or service provider.

    I am not a lawyer, but to me this is analogous to suing Walmart for tripping and falling over broken pavement in their parking lot. Easier to prove where someone fell and was injured, then determine fault, if any.

    The theft of movies could be inside the office building or campus the film is being sent out on over the internet and not on carrier lines.

    More analogous to claiming the U.S. Post Office, FedEx or UPS is complicit in shipping illegal contraband within the USA or anywhere.

    But, I do agree that the carrier networks are NOT as impervious as they should be, largely because no government oversight exists and the assumption that software security products secure software from theft…..so, I am happy to see the case aired and could easily make the claim that the fiber in use today globally is insufficient and downright dangerous to think massive data thefts and eavesdropping is not the crime of today and the future, especially with “digital assets” in motion to and from users to the “cloud”. Securing data at-rest is far less difficult than data in-motion and it is too dynamic a task to do this with software, quantum or not, alone….the transmission medium here is in dire need of an upgrade and the fiber makers are ready and so is Apriori Network Systems (sorry for the infomercial !) who saw this as an issue as early as 2016 and is working to bring a well thought out, patented solution to the world markets now.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Polls

Do you agree public funding should be used to support mobile operators to more broadly deploy Open RAN?

Loading ... Loading ...